Como es la primera vez que voy a hablar de cine en esta página presentaré mi visión general del tema. Hoy en día hay mucha gente (sobre todo en Internet y/o en España, al parecer) que parecen ver que la función del cine es elevar a la persona a las más altas esperas del pensamiento, hacerle plantearse las más profundas preguntas de su existencia y en general cambiar sus vidas. Símplemente está de moda pensar así.

Accede al cuerpo del mensaje para ver el contenido completo.

• 1995: I installed a Red Hat distribution. It was crap mostly because of the RPM-hell, but better than MS-DOS or Windows 95, so I kept it.
• 1996: I installed Debian. No RPM-hell but nice apt-get. Loved it.
• 2004: My blood boiled after and entire afternoon trying to make a scanner work, which I knew was supported by SANE. Deleted the Debian and installed Mandriva. The scanner, and almost everything else, worked at once.
• 2009: After five years using and advocating Mandriva and making fun of the average Ubuntu user I switched to KUbuntu 9.04. Talk about consistency.

So, why?. Well, it's not like Ubuntu has been better all the time that Mandriva and I just keept resisting for brand loyalty; I've been testing almost every major Ubuntu release, and still found the current (at the time) Mandriva version superior. Superior for me means that more hardware was detected and configured to work, the KDE desktop was better configured and integrated (I don't use the lobotomized Gnome), and the Mandriva administration tools were superior.

But two weeks ago I tested KUbuntu 9.04 and found it superior. The hell froze. It was superior because:

o All the things that Mandriva never got really right on my Sony Vaio just worked on Ubuntu. This include:

• The suspend to disk and RAM (in Mandriva about 30% of the time the computer would never came back from suspend to RAM, and suspend to disk never worked.)
• The sound; Mandriva pulseaudio configuration would sometimes leave me without sound, usually when opening a flash video from Firefox or coming back from suspend to RAM. I fixed that killing pulseaudio and restarting the sound system, but it was a pain.
• The Firefox addons. Ubuntu uses an special Firefox extensions that install Flash, Java, and other things automatically the first time you need it. It shows a wizard and installs everything, like in Windows. With Mandriva you need to go chasing the plugins on the net and install them yourself, or fiddle with repositories. Ubuntu has some other user-friendly niceties like these, like the NVidia/ATI driver installer and configurator (envy-ng.)

o The speed. Holy cow, this thing is fast! It's not only much faster than Mandriva (much faster booting, faster desktop, much better user experience all around) is also much faster than previous Ubuntu versions.

There is only one thing I'll miss from Mandriva, and it's its awesome DrakConf. KUbuntu has a loosy collection of configuration programs under "System", some other things you're supossed to configure with KDE "SystemSettings" and some other things you are supossed to configure clicking on some taskbar icons, but Mandriva DrakConf got most of these under a single, user friendly GUI and it also got a lot more configuration modules than Ubuntu have.

So, Ubuntu users, you can mock me now. I'll not reply, as a penitence.

I've just released rapidsucker 0.6. This version adds the most requested feature: support to limit the number of paralell downloads. By default the limit will be 8, but if you want to change it you can add the options "maxparalell = X" (being X a number) to your $HOME/.rapidsucker.conf file.

Another feature is that pasted urls will be extracted in a smarter way, for example if you paste a line like "Part1:http://rapidshare.com/blabls543543 (rar part)" the real URL (http://rapidshare.com/blabls543543 in this example) will be correctly extracted.

You can download it on usual link.

Update 08 january 2009: I've just released 0.6.1 which add a total of finished and pending files instead of printing a line for each so the output is not clodged when you are downloading have lots and lots of files. Also I'm using temporal file names for the cookies so you should have less problem running several rapidsuckers in the same directory (in this case you're also advised to use the config option "rememberurls=false".)

I found that on my system, using a compiled KDE 4 from the sources goes much better than Mandriva's provided packages. And since it's pretty easy to do, I'm writing an article detailing the steps. Back in 2004 I wrote an article about running a KDE 3 version compiled from CVS (in spanish that time). Since your distribution probably already have packages for KDE4 you could be wondering what are the advantages of compiling KDE4 over using the distro packages. These are:

• You can optimize the compilation for your target machine. This means that if you, for example, have a Dual Core 2 CPU you can instruct the GCC compiler to generate code specific to the features of your processor (like SSE and a lot of other things) that will make the binary run noticeably faster on your computer than the generic code compiled for Pentium.
• You'll always be on the cutting edge, having the very last KDE version. Of course this is both good and bad; it means you'll have always the latest features but you'll have too the latest bugs. My advice is to only install form sources when the current KDE version (4.1.0, 4.2.0, etc) is at least at beta stage.
• If you're a programmer and find a bug or want to implement some feature, you'll have the source code to it.
• You'll not depend on the options choosen by your distribution package maintainer.

[Read the rest of the article inside]